Yamaha FZS-Fi V3.0 vs Honda CB Hornet 160R: Real-World Performance Comparison
Modified On Jun 3, 2020 12:41 PM By Gaurav Sadanandfor Yamaha FZS-FI V3
- 13550 Views
- Write a comment
Here’s how the FZS-Fi V3.0 stacks up against its Japanese rival in real-world conditions
Yamaha updated the FZS-Fi a couple of months ago with a new design and a couple of extra features. That said, it retains the exact same engine as before and hence feels a bit underpowered when compared to its rivals. We already put it up against the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V in real-world conditions, and here’s how it performed. And just in case you were wondering, here’s how it stacks up against the Honda CB Hornet 160R.
Acceleration:
Yamaha FZS-Fi V3.0 |
Honda CB Hornet 160R |
|
0-60 |
5.97 seconds |
5.08 seconds |
0-100 |
20.10seconds |
15.99 seconds |
The Hornet 160R packs a bigger 162.71cc motor and produces more power and torque compared to the FZS-Fi (149cc). Thanks to this, it’s almost a second quicker off the line and trumps the FZS-Fi Version 3.0 by a massive lead of 4 seconds in the 0-100kmph run despite weighing 4kg more.
Also Read: Yamaha FZS-FI: Same Price, Other Options
Roll-Ons:
Yamaha FZS-Fi V3.0 |
Honda CB Hornet 160R |
|
30-70kmph |
6.70sec |
6.68 seconds |
40-80kmph |
9.38sec |
8.23 seconds |
The Yamaha FZS-FI V3 has a meaty mid-range which helps it offer near-identical roll-on speeds as the Hornet, well, at least while pulling from 30-70kmph. Post this, the Yammie’s engine feels a bit strained and leaves it trailing behind the Hornet 160R while accelerating from 40-80kmph.
Braking:
Yamaha FZS-Fi V3.0 |
Honda CB Hornet 160R |
|
80-0kmph |
36.44m |
36.3m |
60-0kmph |
20.48m |
20.11m |
Both bikes feature a single-channel ABS setup and are evenly matched in terms of braking distances. However, it’s the FZS-Fi which offers more bite and better feedback through the leavers compared to the Hornet.
Fuel Efficiency:
Yamaha FZS-Fi V3.0 |
Honda CB Hornet 160R |
|
City |
49.31kmpl |
42.85kmpl |
Highway |
55.42kmpl |
52kmpl |
The Yamaha FZS-Fi employs a smaller 149cc, fuel-injected engine that’s been tuned to produce less power in order to extract more fuel-efficiency. The result is a relatively better highway performer and a much better city dweller. The CB Hornet 160R, on the other hand, delivers an overall fuel-efficiency of 47.42kmpl, which is pretty good for a 160cc commuter.