• English
  • Login / Register

Yamaha FZ-X vs Bajaj Pulsar NS125: Performance Numbers Compared

Published On Aug 11, 2021 09:03 AM By Manaal Mahatme for Yamaha FZ X

  • 2464 Views
  • Write a comment

There’s no replacement for engine displacement? We don’t think so



The country had been yearning for the Yamaha XSR155, but instead, got the Yamaha FZ-X. While enthusiasts wanted the peppy and sophisticated motor from the Yamaha R15 in a neo-retro avatar, the company chose its bestseller, the FZ FI to be the right platform. We tested the motorcycle recently and it left us with more questions than answers, more so because just before the FZ-X, we tested the Bajaj Pulsar NS 125 extensively. Here’s how the Japanese 150cc bike fares against the sporty 125cc Indian motorcycle:

Acceleration:

 

Yamaha FZ-X

Bajaj Pulsar NS125

0-60kmph

7.04 seconds

6.60 seconds

0-80kmph

13.89 seconds

12.27 seconds

There’s no replacement for engine displacement, you say? The Yamaha FZ-X begs to differ. Both the bikes come with simple air-cooled engines with Single Overhead Camshafts (SOHC) construction. However, the 149cc mill uses only 2 valves while the 4 valve-equipped 124cc motor on the NS125 allows it to put down its 12PS more efficiently than the 12.4PS on the FZ-X. Not only did the NS125 accelerate quicker, but also managed to breach the 100kmph mark, while FZ-X ran out of breath  at 96kmph.

Roll-ons:

 

Yamaha FZ-X

Bajaj Pulsar NS125

30-70kmph in 3rd gear

11.01 seconds

7.81 seconds

40-80kmph in 4th gear

10.68 seconds

10.53 seconds

These figures demonstrate the mid-range grunt of the engine, and despite the smaller engine and the 5kg heft over the Yamaha FZ-X, the Bajaj Pulsar NS125 is quicker by 3.2 seconds! Though the Yamaha manages to shorten the gap in the 40-80kmph sprint, it still loses to the baby NS.

Braking:

 

Yamaha FZ-X

Bajaj Pulsar NS125

80-0kmph

40.84 mtrs

39.68 mtrs

60-0kmph

23.21 mtrs

21.36 mtrs

The Yamaha FZ-X boasts of a 282mm/220mm disc brake setup aided by single-channel ABS, which on paper, is superior to the NS125’s 240mm disc and 130mm drum brake setup. However, the dual purpose tyres on the Yamaha do not inspire confidence and tend to wash out easily and plays a major role in hampering the braking performance. That said, with the CBS and lack of progression at the rear brake, the NS125 too could scare you. Not only does the simpler setup from Bajaj manage to outshine the FZ-X, but is also on par with the KTM 125 Duke, which flaunts better hardware, single-channel ABS and grippier tyres.

Fuel Efficiency:

 

Yamaha FZ-X

Bajaj Pulsar NS125

City

55.11kmpl

64.75kmpl

Highway

48.67kmpl

56.46kmpl

The Yamaha FZ-X has one of the best city fuel-efficiency figures in its class. However, there’s no beating the smaller and better breathing engine on the Bajaj Pulsar NS125. Not only does the Bajaj beat the Yamaha on the city runs but also on the highway by a fair margin. Adding to the woes of the Yamaha is the 10 litre fuel tank, 2 litres smaller than the Pulsar’s and 3 litres than the FZ FI, which means you’ll end up refueling more of the FZ-X.

Verdict:

Yamaha FZ-X

Bajaj Pulsar NS125

Rs 1,16,800 (std model)

Rs 98,234

Rs 1,21,800 (Y-Connect)

-

The Yamaha FZ-X certainly boasts more features than the Bajaj Pulsar NS125, like the bluetooth-enabled console and LED illumination. But is it really worth the extra Rs 22,000 you’ll splurge over the NS125? We don’t think so. Unless you are sold on the unique styling of the FZ-X and the features, the baby NS will certainly bring a smile to your face.

Published by
Read Full News

You might also be interested in

*Ex-showroom price in Delhi
×
We need your city to customize your experience