Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs N160: Are They THAT Different?
Modified On Dec 20, 2022 09:01 AM By Ishan Lee for Bajaj Pulsar P150
- 768 Views
- Write a comment
We compare their real-world performance, efficiency, braking numbers
Picking between these two can be a real conundrum. Especially because of how closely they are priced. And frankly, the displacement gain isn’t one to brag about. “But Ishan, every CC counts.” Yes, it does, but with Bajaj Pulsars, historically spaking, the cubic jump has always been aspirationally ascending - 150cc, 180cc, 200cc and 220cc. In that context, the P150 and N160 seem awkwardly stacked, or is there more to what meets the eye? Let’s find out if they’re really that far apart in performance, efficiency, and braking.
The thrill-
Think Pulsar, think sporty. And these new-age Pulsar engines sure are impressive. It has all the best hand-me-down qualities of the older N250, hence both are strong in the low and mid range with great tractability for urban commutes and that weekend ride out. There’s enough top-end too but the punch in both motors after 7000rpm is a bit sluggish, it’s just a characteristic of this motor composition. That said, let’s take a closer look at how they get off the line…
Acceleration:
Pulsar |
0-60kmph |
0-80kmph |
0-100kmph |
P150 |
6.01sec |
10.91sec |
21.05sec |
N160 |
5.24sec |
9.44sec |
16.55sec |
The numbers on the P150 are pretty impressive and it holds its own rather well till 80kmph. Needless to say, their 0-100kmph sprint time split can only be explained with that age-old saying, “ain’t no replacement to engine displacement, son”. But the plucky little P150 isn’t too far behind; and given that it’s meant to be a sporty commuter, it’s really putting in the effort.
Roll-on Acceleration:
Pulsar |
30-70kmph 3rd gear |
40-80kmph 4th gear |
P150 |
6.52sec |
9.01sec |
N160 |
6.13sec |
8.14sec |
We told you these engines are super tractable and we didn’t lie. Both bikes are almost neck to neck when it comes to spooling up from a crawl and their performance is roughly in the same ballpark. With the N160, Bajaj claimed that it had the strongest roll-on acceleration figures in the segment, and it shows. Hence, making easy work of city jaunts is a breeze on both these bikes.
Composure and frugality…
Braking:
Pulsar |
80-0kmph |
60-0kmph |
P150 |
36.20m |
20.04m |
N160 |
33.91m |
18.64m |
In the braking department, the difference between the two motorcycles becomes apparent. The N160 is a sportier motorcycle and hence gets a more aggressive braking setup. Furthermore, aiding its braking ability are its wider tyres and dual-channel ABS. Alternatively, the P150 is a commuter, hence gets skinner tyres, smaller front disc and just single-channel ABS. Also, the feel and feedback on the P150’s brake lever is not as aggressive to suit its commuter style better.
Fuel Efficiency:
Pulsar |
City |
Highway |
P150 |
49.7kmpl |
48.8kmpl |
N160 |
59.11kmpl |
44.38kmpl |
A modern Pulsar stands for as much frugality as it does for performance, and it shows in both siblings. The P150’s more frugal motor certainly gives it an advantage on the highway, and that’s also because it holds a slower 80-85kmph, whereas the N160 holds a higher cruising speed. That said, despite its bigger motor, it returned incredible city efficiency making it the best in its class.
Price:
Pulsar |
Single Disc |
Twin Disc |
P150 |
Rs 1,16,755 |
Rs 1,19,757 |
Pulsar |
Single Channel ABS |
Dual Channel ABS |
N160 |
Rs 1,22,854 |
Rs 1,29,645 |
Verdict:
Looking at the results the winner is clear, and it’s you. If you’re someone who commutes more and occasionally enjoys going out on short rides, the P150 should serve you nicely. It’s got what an urban bike needs and can handle the highway too. Alternatively, if performance matters to you, get the N160 and you’ll get more for your money while the bike being pretty darn frugal. That said, if we had to pick one bike that does it all, we’d get the dual-channel ABS Pulsar N160, because for Rs 10,000 more, you’re getting, like, a lot!