Hero Xtreme 200S vs Bajaj Pulsar 220F vs Suzuki Gixxer SF-Fi: Spec Comparison

How does the Xtreme 200S stack up against its rivals on paper?

Hero MotoCorp has finally decided to step into the performance commuter segment. To broaden its horizon, the company has now introduced another model based on the same platform, called the Xtreme 200S. It’s essentially a full faired version of the streetfighter sibling the Xtreme 200R, and as you would expect, shares the same underpinnings. However, with a market already dominated by the likes of the Bajaj Pulsar 200F and Suzuki Gixxer SF-Fi, does the Xtreme 200S stand a chance? Here’s a look at how the bike fares against its competition on paper.

Engine:

The Xtreme 200S borrows its engine from the “R” version but adds an extra kilo to its kerb weight thanks to the addition of a fairing. While we don’t have performance figure for the bike, the increment in weight shouldn’t affect the numbers by a huge margin. The Xtreme 200S is slightly down on power compared to the Pulsar 220F but has the upper hand against the Gixxer SF. 

The Xtreme 200S, like the Pulsar 220F, uses a carburettor for its fuel delivery system. The former offers good low and mid-range performance but runs out of breath towards to top of the rev range. On the contrary, the 220F has the meat of its power residing in the mid-range. The Gixxer SF with a smaller 154.9cc motor maybe the slowest of the three but it comes with fuel injection which offers smoothness and refinement levels next to none. It also provides better throttle response. 

The low weight paired with a frugal engine helps it deliver excellent fuel efficiency figures of 51kmpl in the city and 62.47kmpl out on the highway. Interestingly, the Pulsar 220F, weighing it at 155kg, manages to return an average fuel efficiency figure of 51kmpl.

To put things into perspective, the Xtreme 200R, which uses the same engine as its faired sibling, delivered 40.69kmpl and 36.90kmpl in the city and highway respectively. These figures could vary on the “S” model, but not by much.

Underpinnings:

The Xtreme 200S shares the exact same underpinnings as its streetfighter sibling. However, Hero says the front suspension has been retuned to carry the extra weight of the front fairing. None of these bikes are out-and-out sportbikes, in fact, they are sporty commuters. And this shows in the way they ride. 

To begin with, all three bikes use different frames to suit their needs and to keep costs in check. In terms of suspension, it's the Xtreme 200S which feels the most balanced, supplemented by its MRF tyres that offer good stability. The Pulsar 220F is set up on the softer side as it’s tuned for better ride quality. Having said that, it still handles pretty well.

One would expect the bike with a single downtube frame (cheapest) to be the worst handler, but it’s actually quite the opposite. Its stiff suspension setup paired with chunky rubber enables it to corner really well, although, on the downside, it doesn’t soak in bumps all that well. 

The Xtreme 200S gets the biggest front disc, which should give it the upper edge in terms of braking. While the Gixxer SF with its 266mm disc is just a tad better at braking compared to the  Pulsar 220F. Single-channel ABS comes as standard for the Xtreme 200R and the Pulsar 220F. As for the Gixxer SF, it’s offered in both ABS and non-ABS variants for the Carb and Fi.

Dimensions:

All three bikes have their own benefits. For instance, the Xtreme 200S gets a shorter wheelbase, which aids its handling capabilities and slots it in between its rivals. Comparatively, the Gixxer SF has the advantage of a lower seat height and the least weight, which would be a boon for short riders. On the contrary, it's the Pulsar 220F that gets the biggest fuel tank, which means fewer fuel stops.

Price and Verdict:

All three bikes have been designed for consumers looking for a bit more style for their commute. However, each one of these bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses.

So it all boils down to the kind of rider you are. If you’re looking for a comfortable ride which performs decently well and looks good at the same time, the Xtreme 200R fits the bill.  

The Pulsar 220F may look a bit dated now but it has its own cult following nevertheless. Despite being almost a decade-old design, the bike still manages to offer the most power in this comparison without burning a hole in your wallet.  

Lastly, if you’re more of a thrill seeker on a budget who like pushing their bike to the limit, the Gixxer SF-Fi won't disappoint. However, its lack of power will leave you wanting for more.

Images for Pulsar 220F used for illustration purposes only*